The company’s lawyer, Arsen Astashkin, successfully represented and protected the interests of the client – the head of a representative body of local self-government, in the case of bringing the client to administrative liability under Part 1 of Art. 172-7 of the Code of Administrative Offenses (non-notification by a person in the cases and procedure established by law about the existence of a real conflict of interests) and according to Part 2 of Art. 172-7 KupAP (decision-making in conditions of a real conflict of interests).
As a result of the provision of legal aid by a court decision, proceedings in the case of administrative offenses provided for in part 1 of article 172-7 and part 2 of article 172-7 of the Code of Administrative Offenses against the client was closed on the basis of Clause 1 of Article 247 of the Code of Administrative Offenses in connection with the absence of an event and composition of an administrative offense.
The company’s lawyer successfully defended the head of the local council in the administrative offense case
